
State of
Eighty-First General Assembly
STATEHOUSE
Des Moines, Iowa 50319
For Immediate Release Contact: Kimberly Steenhoek
Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2006 (515) 281-6571
Senate Republicans Introduce Bill to
Protect Private Property Rights
DES MOINES – Republican
Senators today filed legislation that would curb the ability of local
governments to seize private property through eminent domain.
“We want to protect the
rights of private property owners,” said Senate Republican Leader Stewart Iverson
(R-Clarion). “While eminent domain is a
necessary tool for public infrastructure projects, its power should be used
carefully.”
The bill tightens
restrictions on how land can be condemned by local governments for public purposes
and specifies that private economic development activities do not constitute
public use. It also enhances
notification requirements when local governments begin eminent domain
proceedings.
“We believe it is a
fundamental principle that private property should not be taken for another
private use,” said Senate Co-President Jeff Lamberti (R-Ankeny). “Landowners should have the right to
determine whether to sell their property without pressure from the government.”
The legislation also
strengthens requirements for condemning property within a slum or blighted
urban renewal area. Under the bill,
property in these urban renewal areas would have to be considered on a
parcel-by-parcel basis and meet certain established criteria in order to be
condemned. Currently, properties within
slum or blighted urban renewal areas can be condemned solely on the basis of
their location.
Republican senators said the
legislation is needed because a June 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Kelo et al. vs. City of New London, CT, allowed
economic development to be considered a “public use” for private property condemnation. The decision has been championed as a boost
for local governments that seek to condemn land for economic development
purposes.
Brad Hamilton, a business
owner in
“We need to take a preemptive
strike to ensure business owners like Brad Hamilton are protected,” said
Economic Development Co-Chair Bob Brunkhorst (R-Waverly). “The government shouldn’t have the right to
take your land just because someone wants to build a new strip mall.”
Since June 2005, 38 other
states have introduced legislation addressing eminent domain issues.
###